IGNORANCE.

Money does not buy you happiness intelligence.

David Koch really believes that global warming is good for you. *slap* Is this a joke? He's probably just scared that Koch Industries' pollution will be regulated by the government. He says,

“The Earth will be able to support enormously more people because a far greater land area will be available to produce food,” he says. Lengthened growing seasons in the northern hemisphere, he says, will make up for any trauma caused by the slow migration of people away from disappearing coastlines.

This is coming from New York's second richest man. Did he ever, just once, ever crack open a book and read up on the scientific facts?

Hmm, lets check out those facts Koch missed
  • The fact that agriculture will decline being that the land will be literally COOKED.
  • I guess the fact that thousands of people will become climate change refugees after loosing their land.
  • The fact that our coastlines will dissappear with the rising sea levels.
  • The fact that his home, New York will be underwater.
  • The ocean will turn acidic.
  • The fact that half the world’s inhabited area will become uninhabitable being that it is TOO HOT for humans to survive.
  • Oh and the fact that we all WILL DIE from these effects!
  • Disease-causing and warm love insects will migrate to warming countries. ie; mosquitoes carrying malaria.
  • DEADLY STORMS!
  • SEVERE DROUGHTS AND HEAT WAVES

.. To name a few. So yeah, you really put your foot in your mouth with that one KOCH!

6 comments:

  1. Um, those are not facts, those are speculations. Facts are known truths. Just saying....

    ReplyDelete
  2. If you are referring to the effects of global warming, those are know scientific facts.

    Simply read up on it and you will see.

    ReplyDelete
  3. You have read speculative arguements that say that global warming causes this or that. It is the same as Mr. Koch saying that it would produce a longer growing season, it is speculation.
    If you want to win the arguement, you have to come with known truths. Otherwise your just a blogger with an opinion.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Again, these are not "speculative arguments". These are scientific facts of what would happen should we continue polluting the atmosphere.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I only suggest that when you attack the character of another person, you need to be honest with your accusation. Rebutting on emotion blinds you to the facts and cause speculation.
    You may think that I'm a "Jerk" and many people may agree, but you need facts to back that up before you can say definitely. To see a true honest debate on global warming read the following, http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_are_the_advantages_of_global_warming
    It's not about who is right or wrong, it's about both sides peeling away the layers to unveil the truth.
    That can not happen when you fail to accept that perceived enemies may have valid arguments. Until you can think that way, you are just a blogger with an opinion...

    ReplyDelete
  6. Koch's actions are facts. That is all I need to conclude how he feels about the environment. Which is nothing.

    And I am very open minded. But when the fact is starring me in the face, I tend to believe it.

    By the way, "wiki" is a known unreliable source.

    ReplyDelete